Our departments

Customer Service:
Telephone: (866) 310-9147
info@vpdetectives.com
Risk Management:
Telephone: (866) 310-9147
risk@vpdetectives.com
Lead Investigator:
Freddie Leon Parish P.I.
Telephone: (866) 310-9147
freddie@vpdetectives.com
 
Support department:
Telephone: (866) 310-9147
support@vpdetectives.com
 
Job opportunities:
Telephone: (866) 310-9147
jobs@vpdetectives.com
 
 

 
feedback
Send Clear

main office

Vantage Point Investigations

2201 East Willow St
Suite D178 | Signal Hill Ca 90755
(866) 310-9147Freephone:
(562) 481-3793FAX:

Our promise to you

We will not take your case unless we are confident that we are suited to deliver precisely what is requested. Once we take your case we will conduct the investigation in a time efficient and professional manner, always keeping your satisfaction as our goal. At the conclusion we will deliver a concise and well written report in a timely manner. Last of all we will make sure you are satisfied before we close the case.

We look forward to the opportunity to discuss your project. We know investigative matters often involve highly charged, private situations that require the utmost discretion. We are sensitive to this and know how to minimize the stress in handling matters of a delicate nature. Call or e-mail a note and we'll give you the information you need to make a decision.

 

Ninth Circuit Court Information

    The Ninth Circuit Court recently ruled on a law enforcement case involving the DEA. The court heard challenges by the defendant that his Fourth Amendment Right to Privacy was violated when the DEA placed a GPS Tracking Device on the vehicle he was driving. The Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of the DEA. This court found that Mr. Juan Pineda-Moreno's Fourth Amendment Rights were not violated when the DEA placed a GPS Tracking Device on the vehicle he was driving. This case is definitely a win for the law enforcement community, but earlier in the month the US court of appeals for the District of Columbia reversed a conviction based on the failure of law enforcement to secure a warrant for the use of a GPS Tracking Device. It seems that our courts are divided on this issue. As a result, it is inevitable that we will see in the future continued court privacy challenges and attempts by the governments to enact legislative restrictions on the use of these devices by law enforcement, private investigators and individuals. Below is a dispatch written by Jimmie Mesis, LPI. He is the Legislative Chairman of the National Council of Investigators & Security Services-(NCISS). The post was distributed to all members of the NCISS on their website. The original post can be viewed at http://nciss.com/Legislation/GPS_tracking_without_warrant.htm

    Ninth Circuit Court Rules on Law Enforcements Use of GPS Tracking Devices

    By: Jimmie Mesis-NCISS Legislative Chairman

    Ninth Circuit Court Makes Ruling in Favor of GPS Tracking Without a

    Warrant

    By: Jimmie Mesis, LPI-NCISS Legislative Chairman

    A ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit yesterday may
    have adverse affects on the use of GPS trackers by private
    investigators. The court actually ruled in favor of law enforcement
    declaring they did not violate the Fourth Amendment rights of Juan
    Pineda-Moreno when the DEA placed a tracking device on his vehicle in
    2007.

    While this may be a victory for law enforcement, it brings unnecessary
    attention to the existence and use of GPS tracking devices by
    individuals and private investigators. Media outlets are already jumping
    on this topic and will likely start contacting detective agency owners
    asking if and how they use GPS tracking devices on cases. CNN already
    did this yesterday and I'm sure local TV news channel will follow.

    There is no doubt that the privacy advocates will use the publicity
    generated by this ruling to immediately cause legislators to introduce a
    bill regulating the use of GPS trackers, especially by non-law
    enforcement. This publicity was inevitable and the courts ruling will
    likely accelerate anti GPS legislation at the federal level.

    The Court ruled that people have no expectation of privacy when a
    vehicle is parked in the driveway or in public view. However, earlier
    this month the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
    Circuit reversed a conspiracy conviction based on law enforcement
    authorities failing to acquire a warrant using a GPS unit. So, the
    courts on opposite ends of the country are split on this issue.

    The NCISS legislative committee will continue to monitor this breaking
    news and work with legislators to protect the interest of private
    investigators and security companies that use GPS tracking devices for
    lawful purposes in the course of business.

    The national Council of Investigative & Security Services website can be found at http://www.nciss.org./

    Thanks for visiting our website.